Saturday, September 16, 2006
Does the Pope have a right to criticize jihad?
Certain Islamic political leaders have demanded a personal appology from Benedict, and Morrocco has actually withdrawn its embassador to the Vatican. My question is this: Does the pope have some political requirement to be politically correct? I personally believe that Jesus was a teacher of Unity, a teacher that we are all Children of God... But, does the pope have to teach this? The Vatican has been scrambling to downplay the comment, saying that the pope was pointing to the wrongness of Holy War, that God would never demand violence of his children, no matter what a prophet might say. They've also been saying that the Pope respects the people of the islamic faith. But, does he HAVE to?"The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war," the
Pope said. "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to
spread by the sword the faith he preached'."
"Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul," the pope also said in his speech, calling on different cultures to engage in dialogue.
I personally believe in the "one heart" of all true lovers of God. I believe that there is One God, and that there have been MANY true prophets over the course of human history. Each of those come at a certain time, with a certain message, and that message is tailored to that specific time and place. While I have found Jesus' teachings to resonate with me the most deeply, I cannot recomend them to all. MANY people have read the Bible and found within it the command to kill in God's name, just as some have done with the Qu'aran. Past popes are within that group. That there is now a Supreme Pontiff at the healm speaking out against violence says much about the evolution of Western Culture.
But, this doesn't mean that Benedict believes a word of my interpretation of scripture. The Catholic Church... EVERY Christian church in modern times, actually... teaches that Jesus is the doorway to heaven. "I am The Way, The Truth, and The Life. No one comes to the Father but through Me" If Benedict really believes that literally, why should he be expected to teach something different? Why should he be expected to teach that Mohammed was a great guy, when The Prophet single-handedly created a movement that destroyed Christianity's influence in the middle east in the late 600's? Wouldn't this be like the President of the United States being expected to say what a great and peaceful leader Jefferson Davis was? I don't agree that Mohammed was evil, because I've read the teachings of the Sufi Masters, and if that is the fruits of true devotion to the path of Mohammed, then Mohammed MUST have had his Spiritual ducks in a row.
But I'll come out and say it too: Holy War is stupid. God doesn't want us killing each other. Screw PC'ness and respecting everyone's religion for a moment. Jihad, as it is preached by Islamic Extremists, is so obviously against God's will that it doesn't take someone even remotly as holy as the pope to see it.
My number 1 point, however, is this: Why is everyone acting so surprised that the Pope would be saying that other religions aren't as good as Christianity? Isn't that his damn job? It's like being surprised that the Michigan Militia is against open borders. For most of the time, my beliefs are pretty PC, but I don't get surprised when other people aren't, and I don't hold them up to some kind of standard that's against their true nature or that contradicts their job description. News flash, international community: The Pope Likes Jesus better than Mohammed... What a scoop! And remember, you heard it here first on The Mystic Christian Reader!
you know, speaking of holy war and political correctness, one of the Chinese military top brass's critique of the "war on terra" is that the US hasn't come out and said that it's basically a war against islamic extremism. that would at least define the goal of this "war" a little better. might even make it win-able. i'm not saying we're in a holy war, but bush went from saying "crusade" to "war on terror" and obviously the truth is somewhere in between.
It was a nice sentiment - the idea that religion should not be spread by violence or coercion. But, for the life of me, I can't see why he needed to include that quote to make his point though.
First, it simply isn't true that the only things have come of Islam are "evil and inhuman." There are many, many peaceful regular people who go through their day doing the right things, taking care of the needs of others in humility who are inspired to do so by their faith in the Qur'an. He could have left out the quote and his point would have been no less valid.
Second, it's predictable that the more extremist factions of Islam would use it as an excuse to behave in such a way make this sentiment look true. Thus, if the Pope desired to teach the world a lesson about tolerance, by his insulting Islam and garnering an intolerant response from hardline Muslims, he has given the extremists in the Christian west more to work with in selling their message of distrust and hatred of Islam and its adherents as a whole - a very dangerous thing in these days.
<< Home